RAMP Principals Speak at Debate on Potential Increase in the Qualifying Period for Indefinite Leave to Remain

Yesterday evening there was a Westminster Hall Debate on a potential increase in the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain following e-petitions 727360 and 727356. RAMP Principals took part in the debate.

Chris Murray MP argued that the immigration system currently offers limited ways to encourage positive behaviour, social cohesion, and integration. He suggested that if the qualifying period for settlement is extended, the Government should take a more creative approach to designing a system that benefits both migrants and the communities in which they live.

Olivia Blake MP noted that extending the qualifying period for settlement may reduce the UK’s attractiveness to international talent, which could have implications for science and research in universities which rely on skilled workers.

Tim Farron MP argued that uncertainty over settlement rules is unfair to migrants, risks driving away skilled workers, creates difficulties for employers, and ultimately harms the economy.